In the last few years, Tibetan contemporary art has begun to receive significant attention. A small group of artists, some living in Tibet, others in exile, are finding opportunities to exhibit their work and are being recognized as an important force in the evolution and vitality of Tibetan culture. I have not yet had the good fortune of attending any of these contemporary Tibetan art exhibitions, but I am eager to do so.
The other day, a google alert for Tibetan art brought my attention to a fine article by Carole McGranahan and Losang Gyatso, speaking about the artists’ and scholars’ symposium Waves on the Turquoise Lake: Contemporary Expressions of Tibetan Art which took place in September, 2006.
I’m not Tibetan. I create traditional Tibetan art and am also expanding the boundaries of my work — both by applying traditional techniques to new imagery and by complementing my traditional images with new techniques. Up to now, even my “new” imagery is drawn from Tibetan and related cultures. So even though I’m not Tibetan, the questions of Tibetan contemporary art are very close to my heart.
Cultural preservation seems a worthwhile endeavor, especially when a particular culture is threatened and repressed and undergoing rapid, largely externally-driven change as is the case for the Tibetans. I am honored to play a part in preserving a precious Tibetan tradition — even if it’s not very traditional for a “foreigner” to be doing so. But I’m also aware that culture cannot be petrified and continue to live. The emphasis on preservation must be tempered by an openness to growth, change, evolution, life…
The article on Waves on the Turquoise Lake quotes Tsering Shakya asking “What is the Tibetanness of this?” as roundtable participants explored issues of contemporary Tibetan art in light of the pressures to conform which are found in the Tibetan exile community. “What is Tibetan about this art?” So far, most of the contemporary work I have seen by Tibetan artists is heavily influenced by traditional forms and symbols of Tibetan art and culture. One day in the future, perhaps, that will no longer be the case. At that point, will it matter whether one is a Tibetan contemporary artist or simply a contemporary artist? Or is there another way to express the Tibetan experience and struggle for identity, maybe in ways that are more universally human? For now, I am deeply moved by the use of these ancient symbols in the expression of current human, and particularly Tibetan, experience.
In some way I feel that all my own work is contemporary, even the traditional pieces, because it’s being produced now, in today’s world, where the images of tradition do not occupy the same space they once did. At the same time, I resonate with the tradition that’s contained even in my “contemporary” works, even if it’s not the tradition I was born into.
For more on contemporary Tibetan art, see also the Mechak Center for Contemporary Art.
Dear Leslie,
I’ve just stumbled upon your blog and posting on Tibetan Contemporary Art and wanted to say hello and pass along a link for future reference for you and other artists. My partner and I began BECA gallery about 6 months ago and half of our program features emerging contemporary art from outside of the US. We include works from US based emerging artists as well. We usually post 3-6 open Calls to Artists per year at: http://becagallery.typepad.com/my_weblog/call-to-artists.html
We do not have a Call currently posted but you may check this page periodically for updates or feel free to send us your email address and ask to be notified when we post new Calls. Please don’t forget to let us know your city,state, country so that you receive appropriate info. for your geographic location.
Best regards,
~ Melissa Roberts
becagallery@gmail.com
Dear Melissa,
Thanks for visiting. I checked out your website and am impressed by the work you’re doing in New Orleans. I will look for your upcoming artist calls.
Best wishes for the success of your gallery,
Leslie
yea nice Work 😀